|
|
 |
| CA55 Series |
 |
|
| Flange S45C |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=220m/min: d=0.8~1.5mm: f=0.15~0.35mm/rev: Wet: DNMG150412HQ |
| · |
CA5515 machined 1.5 times as many workpieces as Competitor F. |
| · |
CA5515 delivered more stable performance without chipping in comparison with Competitor F. |
|
|
|
| Hub Turbine S45C |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=200m/min: d=1~1.5mm: f=0.1~0.3mm/rev: Wet: DNMG150412HQ |
| · |
CA5525 machined more than 1.5 times as many workpieces as Competitor H. |
| · |
CA5525 cutting edges remained in better condition than those of Competitor H. |
|
|
|
| Shaft SNCM420H |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=~170m/min: d=1.0mm f=0.25mm/rev: Wet: CNMG120408GS |
| · |
CA5525 machined 1.5 times as many workpieces as Competitor I. |
| · |
CA5525 cutting edges remained in better condition those of Competitor I and ready for further machining. |
|
|
|
| Clutch Parts S35C Forged |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=150m/min: d=1~1.8mm: f=0.15mm/rev: Wet: WNMG080408CQ |
| · |
CA5525 machined 1.5 times as many workpieces as Competitor J. |
| |
(All six cutting edges of CA5525 were available for machining 450 pcs/edge) |
|
|
|
| Gear SCM440 |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=150m/min: d=2.5mm: f=0.4mm/rev: Wet: CNMG120408GS |
| · |
CA5525 machined 1.3 times as many workpieces as Competitor K. |
| · |
CA5525 showed superior fracture resistance compared with Competitor K. |
|
|
|
| Clutch Parts S35C |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=220m/min: d=0.2~1.5mm: f=0.1~0.28mm/rev: Wet: WNMG080408HQ |
| · |
CA5525 machined 1.8 times as many workpieces as Competitor M. |
|
|
|
| BB Chipbreaker |
 |
|
| Gear SCM415(40HRC) |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=120m/min: d=0.3mm: f=0.15mm/rev: Dry: CNGM120408BB1 (KBN10N) |
| · |
Sharp cutting performance and stable chip control even at small D.O.C. finishing. |
|
|
|
| Shaft SCM415(40HRC) |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=120m/min: d=0.7mm: f=0.2mm/rev: Dry: CNGM120408BB2(KBN10N) |
| · |
Smooth chip evacuation without chip entanglement or clogging. |
| · |
Competitor D scratched workpiece surface with entangled chips. |
|
|
|
| PV7020/TN6020 |
 |
|
| Gear SCM415 |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=150m/min: d=0.3mm: f=0.2mm/rev: Wet: TPGR160308L-C |
| · |
TN6020 offered higher cutting speed compared with Competitor K's 110m/min. It also offered 70% longer tool life with good surface roughness and dimensional accuracy even at higher cutting speeds. |
|
|
|
| KPD001 |
 |
|
| Cover ADC12 |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=~480m/min (Roughing),~424m/min (Finishing): d=0.5mm (Roughing / Finishing): f=0.17mm (Roughing), =0.05mm (Finishing): Wet: DNMM150408M-SE |
| · |
Competitor F was unstable, with burr formation. KPD001 remained stable, without burr formation, and was ready for further machining at the conclusion of the test. |
| · |
Competitor F required coolant; KPD001 performed dry cutting and saved coolant costs. |
|
|
|
| KBN Series |
 |
|
| Gear SCr Carburized (60HRC) |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=80m/min: d=0.15mm: f=0.08mm/rev: Wet: CNGA120412 |
| · |
KBN525 machined over 1.6 times as many workpieces as Competitor A. |
| · |
KBN525 offered stable machining with no deviation in workpiece surface roughness or dimensions. |
|
|
|
| Inner Dram SCr Carburized (62HRC) |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=120m/min: d=0.2mm: f=0.15mm/rev: Dry: CNGA120412 |
| · |
KBN525 machined over 1.5 times as many workpieces as Competitor B. |
|
|
|
| X Chipbreaker Series |
 |
|
| Shaft SCr420H (Cold forged) |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=200m/min: d=0.25mm: f=0.16~0.2mm/rev: Wet |
| · |
No chip entanglement under continuous machining. |
| |
Solved dimensional error caused by chip entanglement. |
|
|
|
| Cover SP |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=~350m/min: d=0.2~1.2mm: f=0.25~0.35mm/rev: Wet |
| · |
Produced short chips in good condition. |
| · |
Reduced incidence of scratches on workpiece caused by entangled chips. |
|
|
|
| AT Parts S12C (Cold forged) |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=300m/min: d=0.2mm: f=0.25mm/rev: Wet |
| · |
Produced short chips in good condition. |
|
|
|
| GBA MY |
 |
|
| Cover SPCC |
 |
| |
Improved chip control resulted in: |
| · |
Reduced Cutting Time |
| · |
Faster Chip Removal |
|
| Cutting Conditions: N=1000min-1: f=0.15mm/rev: Wet (Oil base) |
 |
Conventional |
| |
Competitor (Cut-off, 1-corner use) 120pcs/edge
Lower feed rate resulted in longer cutting time (f=0.1mm/rev) and inching to prevent chip entanglement. |
|
GBA-MY |
| |
GBA43R300MY (3-corners use) 200pcs/edge
Good chip control reduced need for inching and greatly diminished total machining time.
 Reduced 27min. / workpiece |
|
|
|
| Pulley SCM |
 |
 |
| Cutting Conditions: V=80m/min(270SFM): d=3.5mm: f=0.06mm/rev: Wet: GBA43R200MY (PR930) |
| GBA-MY delivered excellent chip control; tool life increased by a factor of 6 with no chip entanglement or biting, greatly reducing tool cost per workpiece. Conventional tool's life was short, requiring frequent checks for wear. GBA-MY's lower requirement for checking led to greatly improved machining efficiency. |
| Evaluation from the user |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese
